MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2397069609 · doi:10.14288/1.0050219

A toxicological and chemical evaluation of agricultural runoff discharged into the Nicomekl River, throughout one growing season

2009· article· en· W2397069609 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael James McLeay

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality and Pollution Assessment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSurface runoffEnvironmental scienceAgricultureHydrology (agriculture)Water resource managementGeographyEngineeringEcologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Agricultural pesticide and manure use on commercial vegetable and blueberry farmlands bordering the Nicomekl River, Surrey, B.C., creates the potential for toxic effects on the biota within the drainage ditches and receiving waters. To investigate this possibility, water samples were collected from six drainage ditches and four river locations every three weeks between May and November, 1997. For each of the 85 water samples collected, chronic (7 ± 1 day) survival and reproduction of the cladoceran test organism Ceriodaphnia dubia was determined and compared to that for samples of river water collected upstream of the area of concern. Throughout the 6-month monitoring period, none of the 35 riverwater samples tested exhibited statistically significant mortality, and only two of the 50 ditchwater samples obtained were lethally toxic, with 6-day LC50's of 39.9% and 36.5%. For the remaining 83 water samples, C. dubia reproduction in 5 ditchwater and 5 riverwater samples, from the region of concern, was statistically lower than that in samples of upstream river water. One of the sublethally toxic riverwater samples exhibited toxic responses (paralysis) characteristic of organophosphorous (OP) pesticide contamination, and was collected immediately downstream of a lethally toxic ditch which had discharged within the previous 24 hours. Another sublethally toxic ditch sample had a total ammonia concentration of 10.8 mg/L NH3-N which was believed to be responsible its observed C. dubia reproduction inhibition. This ditch discharged for minimal durations (1-2 hours/day) in the days prior to and following its confirmed NH₃ contamination. In the immediate vicinity of these discharges, ammonia concentrations within the river may have exceeded acute Canadian water quality guidelines for ammonia intended to protect sensitive fish and invertebrate species from acute toxic effects. Further downstream, fully-mixed ammonia concentrations should not have exceeded these acute guidelines, but may have exceeded safe chronic exposure levels. The remaining 24 ditchwater and 18 riverwater samples which were measured for total ammonia all had NH3 concentrations well below the water quality guidelines for chronic exposure. A biological toxicity identification evaluation (TIE) using piperonyl butoxide (PBO) determined that the toxicant(s) in each of the two ditchwater samples which proved lethal to C. dubia were metabolically active OP insecticide(s). Solid phase extraction full-ion-scan gas chromatography mass spectroscopy (GC/MS) analyses performed on the lethal and some of the sublethal samples immediately following observed toxicity were unable to detect the presence of OPs. Liquid-liquid extraction select-ion-scan GC/MS of the lethal samples detected 0.02 - 0.03 µg/L diazinon (OP) in each of the two acutely lethal samples, and 0.03 µg/L chlorpyrifos (OP) and 3 µg/L prometryn (herbicide) in one of the lethal samples; even though there was evidence of OP insecticide losses` during the frozen storage of these samples before their chemical analyses. C. dubia bioassays using portions of the thawed samples used for these later chemical analyses exhibited lesser toxicity relative to that for the fresh samples. Consideration of the analytical values for diazinon and chlorpyrifos together with the toxicity values for these pesticides, determined as part of this investigation and by other researchers, led to the tentative conclusion that diazinon and/or chlorpyrifos were responsible (or at least partly so) for the observed toxic effects. Prometryn is appreciably (i.e., four orders of magnitude) less toxic than either of these two OP pesticides. Diazinon's American suggested acute water quality criteria of 0.08 /^g/L was possibly exceeded in the Nicomekl River during the recorded discharge of one of the two OP contaminated ditches, in the days prior to its confirmed lethal toxicity. Five ditch sediments and three river sediments were collected from the study site in October, 1997, in order to appraise their toxicity to benthic invertebrates. Chronic (14-day) survival and growth inhibition to the amphipod test organism Hyallela azteca for each sample was compared to that for sediment collected from the upstream Nicomekl site. None of sediments collected within the region of agriculture under investigation showed statistically-lower survival relative to that for river sediment collected upstream of the region of concern. One drainage ditch sediment statistically inhibited H. azteca growth. Using a standardized (Environment Canada) laboratory test method and upstream river water as the control water, the majority of ditchwater and riverwater samples collected at 3-week intervals throughout this 6-month monitoring study were not acutely or chronically toxic to Ceriodaphnia dubia. This study did identify that there can be occasional municipal pumping of toxic agricultural runoff waters into the Nicomekl River in the summer months. However, overall, the study site's 1997 agricultural activities and drainage ditch discharges should not have had a significant toxic effect on the biota of the Nicomekl River.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicWater Quality and Pollution AssessmentFrench-language works237,207