Incidence of adenoid cystic carcinoma in nova scotia: 30-year population-based epidemiologic study.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of the head and neck is a rare malignancy of salivary gland origin. Few epidemiologic studies exist assessing the incidence of this tumour. The purpose of the current study was to determine the incidence of ACC of the head and neck in Nova Scotia. Furthermore, we assessed survival outcomes based on presentation sites. METHODS: Nova Scotia is an ideal geographic location in which to conduct retrospective case reviews as there are centralized tertiary care centres and minimal population migration. Furthermore, there is an externally and internally validated cancer registry housed in Cancer Care Nova Scotia. Records at Cancer Care Nova Scotia were retrospectively reviewed to identify all reported cases of ACC since 1979. Age-adjusted incidence rates were calculated standardized to the 2001 Canadian population. Survival curves were plotted to allow assessment of overall survival. A log-rank test was used to compare survival curves for age (> 65 and < 65 years old) and presentation sites. RESULTS: One hundred thirty cases of ACC were identified, with 110 presenting as primary tumours in head and neck sites. The mean (standard error) age-adjusted incidence of ACC in Nova Scotia is 4.5 (0.6) cases per 1 000,000. The incidence did not change significantly over time. The most common site of presentation was the minor salivary glands (40%), followed by the submandibular gland (18.2%) and the parotid gland (17.3%). There was no significant difference for overall and disease-free survival between nonsalivary, major salivary, and minor salivary tumours (p = .97). Significant reductions in survival were found for those diagnosed at > 65 years of age (p < .014) and those with a sinus presentation (p < .005). Sixteen percent of all head and neck cancer patients experienced a distant metastasis of their primary tumour. CONCLUSION: ACC of the head and neck is a rare neoplastic condition that most commonly affects the minor and major salivary glands. Although short-term survival is high, nearly half of all patients will develop metastasis or die of complications of local recurrences.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".