MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2397124409 · doi:10.1177/120347541201600409

Effective Treatment of Chronic Hand Dermatitis with 36 Continuous Months of Alitretinoin Administration: Report of Three Cases

2012· article· en· W2397124409 on OpenAlexaff
Wayne Gulliver, Kenneth A Baker

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicContact Dermatitis and Allergies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAdverse effectDermatologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Moderate to severe chronic hand dermatitis (CHD) is not well controlled by current medical strategies; however, recent studies have shown significant improvement in patients treated with up to 6 months of oral alitretinoin (9-cis-retinoic acid). The results of longer-term continuous treatment are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of alitretinoin for the treatment of CHD. METHODS: The Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) and Modified Total Lesion Symptom Score (MTLSS) were used to assess CHD improvement in three patients treated with alitretinoin (10-30 mg/d). Patients had routine bloodwork and were monitored for adverse events. RESULTS: Significant improvement in MTLSS scores (≈ 76%) was seen at 2 months (p < .002) and maintained for the 3-year treatment period with occasional dosage adjustments. No significant adverse events developed that necessitated treatment withdrawal. CONCLUSION: Alitretinoin was well tolerated in the treatment of these three CHD patients who were carefully monitored over this prolonged treatment period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cutaneous Medicine and SurgerySame topicContact Dermatitis and AllergiesFrench-language works237,207