Bibliographic record
Abstract
To date the genomes of over 600 organisms have been generated of which 100 are from eukaryotes. Together with partial genome data for an additional 700 eukaryotic organisms, these exceptional sequence resources offer new opportunities to explore phylogenetic relationships and species diversity. The identification of highly diverse sequences specific to an EST-based sequence dataset offers insights into the extent of genetic novelty within that dataset. Sequences that are only shared with other related species from the same taxon might represent genes associated with taxon-specific innovations. On the other hand, sequences that are highly conserved across many other species offer valuable resources for performing more in-depth phylogenetic analyses. In the following chapter, we guide the reader through the process of examining their sequence datasets in the context of phylogenetic relationships. Performed across large-scale datasets, such analyses are termed Phylogenomics. Two complementary approaches are described, both based on the use of BLAST similarity metrics. The first uses an established Java tool - SimiTri - to visualize sequence similarity relationships between the EST dataset and three user-defined datasets. The second focuses on the use of phylogenetic profiles to identify groups of taxonomically related sequences.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".