MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Use of Symmetry: Generalization of an Integral Identity Found by M. L. Glasser

2012· article· en· W2397241337 on OpenAlexaff
V. Anghel

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Mathematical Monthly · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematics and Applications
Canadian institutionsAtomic Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneralizationSurface (topology)Permutation (music)Symmetry (geometry)Identity (music)Simple (philosophy)SimplexMathematicsUnit spherePure mathematicsCombinatoricsMathematical analysisPhysicsGeometryPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The integral identity found by M. L. Glasser [3] is generalized using the permutation symmetry of coordinates of an n-spherical surface simplex. The first calculation technique is simple to apply, but the second technique allows further generalization of M. L. Glasser's identity. Analogous results are discussed for the n-hemispherical surface of the unit n-sphere and for the entire surface of the n-sphere. The n-sphere surface result is used to generalize M. L. Glasser's solution to a problem proposed by J. R. Bottiger [2].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Mathematical MonthlySame topicMathematics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207