Data Detection Algorithms for BICM Alternate-Relaying Cooperative Systems With Multiple-Antenna Destination
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes two new data detection algorithms for decode-and-forward alternate-relaying cooperative communication systems. These algorithms are discussed in the context of bit-interleaved coded modulation transmission with a multiple-antenna destination. The interference signal, resulting from the concurrent transmission of the source and one of the relays, is exploited as a beneficial resource to develop an optimal data detection algorithm. We show that the optimal algorithm can be implemented by parallel demappers, each based on a family of Bahl, Cocke, Jelinek, and Raviv algorithms, connected to parallel decoders in an iterative way. Due to the need to buffer the entire frame before decoding, the optimal algorithm suffers from long processing time. A suboptimal algorithm is also proposed to avoid this problem, where each packet is decoded by using two consecutive received packets. The suboptimal algorithm reduces processing time, complexity, bandwidth loss, and memory size with a slight increase in the bit error rate (BER). The BER performance of the proposed algorithms is evaluated via Monte Carlo simulations, and the results indicate their effectiveness in improving the BER performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".