Bibliographic record
Abstract
A previously healthy three-year-old girl presented with a one-week history of an episodic erythematous patch extending from the corner of the mouth to the right cheek. The eruption occurred following eating, but on occasion would occur with teeth brushing and finger sucking. There was no associated pruritus, scale, vesicles, pustules, burning or scarring. The eruption was not associated with sun exposure. Although the eruption seemed to be primarily associated with eating, it was not linked to any particular food. The flushing lasted from 30 min to 60 min, and did not show a response to either a midpotency topical corticosteroid or a topical antibiotic. On review of systems, there were no associated symptoms of facial swelling, wheezing, urticaria, vomiting or abdominal pain. There was no history of involvement in other sun-exposed areas. The patient's past medical history is only significant for a ventricular septal defect, previously spontaneously closed. Of note, there was no history of traumatic delivery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".