MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2397471031 · doi:10.2110/jsr.2016.36

Magnetite Chemistry As A Provenance Indicator In Archean Metamorphosed Sedimentary Rocks

2016· article· en· W2397471031 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Quentin Duparc, Sarah Dare, Pierre A. Cousineau, J Goutier

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sedimentary Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeochemistry and Elemental Analysis
Canadian institutionsMinistère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec)Carleton UniversityUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
FundersUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsArcheanProvenanceGeologyGeochemistryMagnetiteSedimentary rockPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Conventional provenance studies of high grade (e.g., amphibolite facies) metamorphic sandstone are limited due to intense recrystallization, destruction of original minerals, and growth of new minerals. Magnetite is a heavy mineral common in a wide range of sedimentary rocks. It can originate from a wide range of rock sources from high-temperature to low-temperature magmatic, metamorphic, or hydrothermal environments. Laser ablation (LA)-ICP-MS and electron microprobe analytical techniques allowed determination of a wide range of trace elements at sub ppm levels in magnetite to identify the provenance of two Archean sedimentary formations in Eeyou Istchee Baie-James, Québec, Canada. Results were plotted on multi-element diagrams. The most compatible elements in magnetite were identified as the most discriminant elements to differentiate four potential different rock sources for the Magin Formation. Overlap between the spectra of the Magin and Keyano formations substantiate the existence of a common source. Interbedded conglomerate magnetite-bearing clasts were examined to determine potential source-rocks. Mafic clasts apparently do not contain magnetite. Detrital magnetites analyzed have low Ti values that would support either felsic (to intermediate) plutonic or a hydrothermal source. The trace-element spectra of detrital magnetite from the sandstone beds were compared to magnetite spectra from conglomerate clasts of banded iron formation and felsic to intermediate plutonic rocks. Only magnetites from felsic plutonic rocks have a signature similar to those from the sandstone. To further substantiate a felsic plutonic source, a detailed study of magnetite chemistry from ten felsic and intermediate regional plutons from a regional databank allowed us to recognize that each of these plutons has a particular signature on the basis of wide variations in Ni and Cr. From this data base, four individual plutons were identified as potential sources for the Magin Formation. Recently published magnetite discrimination diagrams proposed for mineral deposits can be applied to sedimentary magnetite provenance. However, our database shows the importance of identifying low-Ti magnetite from felsic rocks since these could be misidentified as low-Ti magnetite from hydrothermal mineral deposits. Thus, we propose improvement to these diagrams by differentiating magnetite from felsic magmatic (low Ni/Cr) and hydrothermal (high Ni/Cr) sources before applying the mineral-deposit discrimination diagrams.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.570
Threshold uncertainty score0.975

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Sedimentary ResearchSame topicGeochemistry and Elemental AnalysisFrench-language works237,207