MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2397621107 · doi:10.1109/mnano.2016.2539999

A New Wrinkle in Biosensors: Wrinkled electrodes could be a breakthrough for lab-on-a-chip devices

2016· article· en· W2397621107 on OpenAlexaff
Christine M. Gabardo, Amin Hosseini, Leyla Soleymani

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Nanotechnology Magazine · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrowetting and Microfluidic Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiosensorLab-on-a-chipNanotechnologyTransducerChipAnalyteVolume (thermodynamics)Materials scienceMicrofluidicsComputer scienceBiomedical engineeringChemistryEngineeringElectrical engineeringChromatographyTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biosensors are analytical devices that sense specific, biologically relevant analytes (such as proteins, nucleic acids, metabolites, polysaccharides, and lipids) using a sensing element and a transducer. Lab-on-a-chip (LOC ) biosensing systems combine several laboratory functions on a single miniaturized chip to identify specific biomarkers for health and environmental monitoring as well as disease management. This allows analytical tests to be carried out on smaller-volume samples, using less volume of expensive reagents and without highly trained technicians or expensive laboratory infrastructure, thereby reducing the costs and time associated with conventional testing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.011
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0060.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Nanotechnology MagazineSame topicElectrowetting and Microfluidic TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207