MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2397778779 · doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-134-9_30

Multiplexed Surface Plasmon Resonance Imaging for Protein Biomarker Analysis

2012· article· en· W2397778779 on OpenAlexaff
Éric Ouellet, Louise Lund, Eric T. Lagally

Bibliographic record

VenueMethods in molecular biology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsALCAMSurface plasmon resonanceMicrofluidicsMolecular bindingNanotechnologyAnalyteProteomicsChemistryMolecular imagingBiomarkerMaterials scienceCellMoleculeBiologyNanoparticleBiochemistryChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The reliable detection of ligand and analyte binding is of significant importance for the field of medical diagnostics. Recent advances in proteomics and the rapid expansion in the number of identified protein biomarkers enhance the need for reliable techniques for their identification in complex samples. Surface plasmon resonance imaging (SPRi) provides label-free detection of this binding process in real-time. This chapter details the fabrication of an SPR imaging instrument and its use in analyzing molecular binding interactions with the use of a high-density microfluidic SPRi chip, capable of multiplexed analysis as well as various immobilization chemistries. Controlled recovery of bound biomarkers is demonstrated to enable their identification using mass spectrometry. Finally, activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule (ALCAM), a protein biomarker associated with a variety of cancers, is identified from human crude cell lysates using the microfluidic surface plasmon resonance imaging (SPRi) instrument.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.388 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMethods in molecular biologySame topicAdvanced Biosensing Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207