MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2397888180 · doi:10.1109/apec.2016.7468125

A universal self-calibrating Dynamic Voltage and Frequency Scaling (DVFS) scheme with thermal compensation for energy savings in FPGAs

2016· article· en· W2397888180 on OpenAlexafffund
Shuze Zhao, Ibrahim Ahmed, Carl Lamoureux, Ashraf Lotfi, Vaughn Betz, Olivier Trescases

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLow-power high-performance VLSI design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOntario Centres of Excellence
KeywordsField-programmable gate arrayComputer scienceLookup tableFrequency scalingVoltageElectronic engineeringEmbedded systemComputer hardwareElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) are widely used in telecom, medical, military and cloud computing applications. Unlike in microprocessors, the routing and critical path delay of FPGAs is user dependent. The design tool suggests a maximum operating frequency based on the worst-case timing analysis of the critical paths at a fixed nominal voltage, which usually means there is significant voltage or frequency margin in a typical chip. This paper presents a universal offline self-calibration scheme, which automatically finds the FPGA frequency and core voltage operating limit at different self-imposed temperatures by monitoring design-specific critical paths. These operating points are stored in a calibration table and used to dynamically adjust the frequency and core voltage according to the FPGA temperature when the application circuit is running. The self-calibration process is demonstrated on an Altera Cyclone IV 65-nm FPGA with a digitally controlled dc-dc converter, leading to 40% power savings in a typical digital filter application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score0.516

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.166
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLow-power high-performance VLSI designFrench-language works237,207