Ardley Coal Zone Reservoir Characterization and Post-Scollard Structural Re-Arrangements in the Edson CBM Exploration Block, Alberta
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The stratigraphic study resulted in the recognition of five fluvial sequences within the Scollard succession, which are interpreted as dynamic responses to cyclic slow thrusting phases in the orogen followed by isostatic rebounding. Each of the upper four sequences is capped by laterally continuous coal strata named here ‘N’, ‘Ml’, ‘Mu’ and ‘S’ coal sub-zones, making up the Ardley Coal Zone. Each of the coal sub-zones can be considered an individual reservoir due to particular geometry and sealing characteristics. The examined drillcores show that ‘banded coal’ category is the dominant type of coal in the Edson block. Cleats free of calcite infilling are dominant. Vitrinite reflectance is 0.54-0.59% within the onset of hydrocarbon generation. The coal fracture system inferred from the identified DEM lineaments suggest two areas of potential ‘two-face-cleats systems’ located on either side of the Athabasca River.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".