MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract OT3-01-01: HERMIONE: A phase 2, randomized, open label trial comparing MM-302 plus trastuzumab with chemotherapy of physician's choice plus trastuzumab, in anthracycline naive HER2-positive, locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer patients previously treated with pertuzumab and ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1)

2016· article· en· W2397893479 on OpenAlexaffabout
K Miller, Javier Cortés, SA Hurvitz, IE Krop, Debu Tripathy, S. Verma, Kaveh Riahi, JG Reynolds, Thomas J. Wickham, Ioana Molnar, DA Yardley

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPertuzumabTrastuzumabMedicineAnthracyclineVinorelbineInternal medicineOncologyClinical endpointMetastatic breast cancerCapecitabineHazard ratioBreast cancerInterim analysisDocetaxelChemotherapyCancerRandomized controlled trialConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Although HER2-targeted therapies such as pertuzumab and T-DM1 have improved patient outcomes, treatment resistance typically occurs. MM-302 is a HER2-targeted liposomal doxorubicin in development by Merrimack Pharmaceuticals. In a Phase 1 study, patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) were treated with MM-302 alone and in combination with trastuzumab with or without cyclophosphamide. MM-302 had an acceptable safety profile and promising efficacy was observed in patients not previously exposed to an anthracycline. Trial design: HERMIONE (NCT02213744) is a randomized Phase 2, two-arm, open-label trial designed to evaluate if MM-302 can address an unmet medical need in patients with anthracycline naïve, trastuzumab-, pertuzumab- and T-DM1-pretreated HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancer (LABC)/MBC. Patients are randomized 1:1 to receive MM-302 (30mg/m2, Q3W) plus trastuzumab (6mg/kg, Q3W) or chemotherapy of physician's choice (vinorelbine, capecitabine, or gemcitabine) plus trastuzumab (6mg/kg, Q3W). Eligibility criteria: Centrally confirmed HER2-positive LABC/MBC, no prior anthracycline exposure, prior trastuzumab in any setting, prior pertuzumab and T-DM1 in the LABC/MBC setting, unlimited prior lines of therapy, ECOG 0-1 and LVEF ≥50%. CNS metastases are permitted if stable and without symptoms or steroids for 4 weeks. Specific aims: The primary endpoint is independently assessed progression free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints include investigator assessed PFS, overall survival, response rate, safety and patient related outcomes. Statistics: 250 patients will be enrolled to observe 191 PFS events for 90% power to detect a Hazard Ratio of 0.625. The MM-302 arm will be compared to the control arm on the primary endpoint of PFS using a stratified log-rank test at one-sided 0.025 level. Accrual status: First patient in was December 2014 and enrollment is expected to be complete in late 2016. Sites are open in the US, Canada and Western Europe and are currently enrolling patients. Citation Format: Miller K, Cortes J, Hurvitz SA, Krop IE, Tripathy D, Verma S, Riahi K, Reynolds JG, Wickham T, Molnar I, Yardley DA. HERMIONE: A phase 2, randomized, open label trial comparing MM-302 plus trastuzumab with chemotherapy of physician's choice plus trastuzumab, in anthracycline naive HER2-positive, locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer patients previously treated with pertuzumab and ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-01-01.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.426
Teacher spread0.369 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicCancer Treatment and PharmacologyFrench-language works237,207