Mechanism of<i> Thermoanaerobacterium saccharolyticum</i> β-Xylosidase: Kinetic Studies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The catalytic mechanism of Thermoanaerobacterium saccharolyticum beta-xylosidase (XynB) from family 39 of glycoside hydrolases has been subjected to a detailed kinetic investigation using a range of substrates. The enzyme exhibits a bell-shaped pH dependence of k(cat)/K(m), reflecting apparent pK(a) values of 4.1 and 6.8. The k(cat) and k(cat)/K(m) values for a series of aryl xylosides have been measured and used to construct two Brønsted plots. The plot of log(k(cat)/K(m)) against the pK(a) of the leaving group reveals a significant correlation (beta(lg) = -0.97, r(2) = 0.94, n = 8), indicating that fission of the glycosidic bond is significantly advanced in the transition state leading to the formation of the xylosyl-enzyme intermediate. The large negative value of the slope indicates that there is relatively little proton donation to the glycosidic oxygen in the transition state. A biphasic, concave-downward plot of log(k(cat)) against pK(a) provides good evidence for a two-step double-displacement mechanism involving a glycosyl-enzyme intermediate. For activated leaving groups (pK(a) < 9), the breakdown of the xylosyl-enzyme intermediate is the rate-determining step, as indicated by the absence of any effect of the pK(a) of the leaving group on log(k(cat)) (beta(lg) approximately 0). However, a strong dependence of the first-order rate constant on the pK(a) value of relatively poor leaving groups (pK(a) > 9) suggests that the xylosylation step is rate-determining for these substrates. Support for the dexylosylation chemical step being rate-determining for activated substrates comes from nucleophilic competition experiments in which addition of dithiothreitol results in an increase in turnover rates. Normal secondary alpha-deuterium kinetic isotope effects ((alpha-D)(V) or (alpha-D)(V/K) = 1.08-1.10) for three different substrates of widely varying pK(a) value (5.15-9.95) have been measured and these reveal that the transition states leading to the formation and breakdown of the intermediate are similar and both steps involve rehybridization of C1 from sp(3) to sp(2). These results are consistent only with "exploded" transition states, in which the saccharide moiety bears considerable positive charge, and the intermediate is a covalent acylal-ester where C1 is sp(3) hybridized.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".