Bibliographic record
Abstract
As the 20th anniversary of the reporting of Canada's first AIDS case approaches, Health Canada data indicate that 48 014 positive HIV tests have been reported to Canada's Centre for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control. The number of positive tests reported peaked at 2983 in 1995 and declined to 2104 in 2000. Adult women account for 13.8% of all positive tests and for 24% of positive HIV tests reported among the adult population. As was the case in all previous years, the 30–39 age group accounted for the largest proportion of positive HIV tests in 2000 (41.1%). Since the early 1980s, 17 594 cases of AIDS have been reported to the centre; when adjusted for reporting delay, this figure rises to 19 153. The adjusted number of new AIDS cases peaked at 1859 in 1993 and then declined steadily to 584 in 1999; it is estimated to have rebounded slightly to 644 cases in 2000. Last year, 10.1% of those diagnosed with AIDS were adult women, and 1.2% were children. Slightly more than half (50.8%) of cases diagnosed among adults in 2000 were attributable to men having sex with men, 21.7% were related to injection drug use and 1.2% were attributed to tainted blood and blood products.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.047 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".