MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2398376000

A note on the LEL-equienergetic graphs

2014· article· es· W2398376000 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Muhuo Liu, Bo Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueArs Combinatoria · 2014
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldMathematics
TopicGraph theory and applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsCombinatoricsDiscrete mathematicsEigenvalues and eigenvectors
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let G be a graph with n vertices and μ1, μ2, ..., μn be the Laplacian eigenvalues of G. The Laplacian-energy-like graph invariant LEL(G) = ∑n i=1 √ μi, has been defined and investigated in [1]. Two non-isomorphic graphs G1 and G2 of the same order are said to be LEL-equienergetic if LEL(G1) = LEL(G2). In [2], three pairs of LELequienergetic non-cospectral connected graphs are given. It is also claimed that the LEL-equienergetic non-cospectral connected graphs are relatively rare. It is natural to consider the question: Whether the number of the LEL-equienergetic non-cospectral connected graphs is finite? The answer is negative, because we shall construct a pair of LEL-equienergetic non-cospectral connected graphs of order n, for all n ≥ 12 in this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArs CombinatoriaSame topicGraph theory and applicationsFrench-language works237,207