MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2398532600 · doi:10.1061/40826(186)47

Channel Shear Connectors in Composite Beams: Push-Out Tests

2006· article· en· W2398532600 on OpenAlex
M. U. Hosain, Amit Pashan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Load-Bearing Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCable glandDeckFailure mode and effects analysisMaterials scienceStructural engineeringShear (geology)Compressive strengthComposite materialShear strength (soil)Geotechnical engineeringGeologyEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper briefly summarizes the results of an experimental research program involving the testing of push-out specimens with channel shear connectors. The test program consisted of three series, each with twelve push-out specimens. In each series, six specimens had solid concrete slabs and the other six specimens had concrete slabs incorporating wide-rib profiled metal deck with ribs parallel to the beam. The test parameters included the compressive strength of concrete, length and web thickness of the channel shear connector. The test results showed that, for a given length of channel, the concrete strength dictates the failure mode. In specimens with higher strength concrete, failure was caused by the fracture of the channel web. Crushing of the concrete adjacent to the channel web was the observed mode of failure in specimens with solid slabs when lower strength concrete was used. In most of the specimens with metal deck slabs, a concrete shear plane type of failure was observed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.468
Threshold uncertainty score0.598

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStructural Load-Bearing AnalysisFrench-language works237,207