MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2398838679 · doi:10.4000/gradhiva.3140

Insectes, armes et parures. Les enjeux de la collection d’Achille Raffray (Nouvelle-Guinée, 1877)

2016· article· fr· W2398838679 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGradhiva · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Rural Development Research
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lors de sa mission en 1876 sur la côte nord de Nouvelle-Guinée, l’entomologiste Achille Raffray constitua trois collections. La première est consacrée, sans surprise, aux insectes et aux oiseaux, la deuxième, plus inattendue, aux objets ethnographiques et la troisième aux crânes humains. À son retour de mission, toutes ces collections furent achetées par l’État, les objets intégrant le musée d’Ethnographie du Trocadéro. Jusqu’à nos jours, ce dernier ensemble d’une centaine de pièces n’a pas attiré l’attention des chercheurs. Il est cependant pour l’époque un exemple remarquable de collecte et le récit de voyage que Raffray publia dans Le Tour du monde permet de comprendre comment celle-ci fut menée, au regard des débats qui agitaient alors le milieu anthropologique sur la question de l’art et de l’esthétique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.422
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it