Insectes, armes et parures. Les enjeux de la collection d’Achille Raffray (Nouvelle-Guinée, 1877)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lors de sa mission en 1876 sur la côte nord de Nouvelle-Guinée, l’entomologiste Achille Raffray constitua trois collections. La première est consacrée, sans surprise, aux insectes et aux oiseaux, la deuxième, plus inattendue, aux objets ethnographiques et la troisième aux crânes humains. À son retour de mission, toutes ces collections furent achetées par l’État, les objets intégrant le musée d’Ethnographie du Trocadéro. Jusqu’à nos jours, ce dernier ensemble d’une centaine de pièces n’a pas attiré l’attention des chercheurs. Il est cependant pour l’époque un exemple remarquable de collecte et le récit de voyage que Raffray publia dans Le Tour du monde permet de comprendre comment celle-ci fut menée, au regard des débats qui agitaient alors le milieu anthropologique sur la question de l’art et de l’esthétique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".