MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2399158334

The Mesozoic Orpheus rift basin, offshore Nova Scotia and Newfoundland, Canada: Synrift and early postrift evolution of a well- imaged North Atlantic rift basin

2010· article· en· W2399158334 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nexen Petroleum

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyPaleontologyRiftMesozoicPaleozoicBasementStructural basinEvaporitePassive marginArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Orpheus basin of offshore eastern Canada formed before opening of the North Atlantic Ocean. We have identified four distinct tectonostratigraphic packages (A-D) associated with the basin’s early development. Packages A, B, C, and D represent Paleozoic prerift strata and basement, Middle Triassic to Early Jurassic synrift strata, Early to Middle Jurassic postrift strata, and Middle to Late Jurassic postrift strata, respectively. The middle part of package B is likely salt. Rifting began by the Late Triassic and continued into the Early Jurassic. Regional shortening occurred after rifting (during the Early to Middle Jurassic), producing salt-cored detachment folds, detached thrust faults, and regional uplift and erosion. Tectonic quiescence followed shortening, leading to widespread deposition. Postrift salt movement resumed during the Middle to Late Jurassic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological formations and processes→French-language works237,207→