MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2399304593 · doi:10.1021/acs.cgd.6b00547

Enantiomer-Specific Oriented Attachment of Guanidine Carbonate Crystals

2016· article· en· W2399304593 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCrystal Growth & Design · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicOrigins and Evolution of Life
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsEnantiomerChirality (physics)CrystallizationCrystallographyCircular dichroismChemistryGuanidineCarbonateStereochemistryOrganic chemistryChiral symmetry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oriented attachment, a nonclassical crystallization phenomenon, describes the spontaneous self-assembly of adjoining crystals with common crystallographic orientations. Introducing chiral recognition between crystals during oriented attachment enables enantiomer-specificity and the formation of homochiral structures. Herein, we report efficient enantiomer-specific oriented attachment for suspended crystals of guanidine carbonate to form mesoscale homochiral or enantioenriched aggregates under boiling or shaking conditions. These aggregates display polyhedral macrostructures and their chirality was monitored using circular dichroism and polarized light microscopy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.654
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it