MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2399530416 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2016.7472327

Energy efficient beamforming for secure communication in cognitive radio networks

2016· article· en· W2399530416 on OpenAlex
Jian Ouyang, Min Lin, Wei‐Ping Zhu, Daniel Massicotte, A. Lee Swindlehurst

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Communication Security Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeamformingComputer scienceCognitive radioMathematical optimizationEfficient energy useQuality of serviceBase stationTransmitter power outputUnderlayOptimization problemIterative methodArtificial noiseChannel (broadcasting)Signal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Physical layerAlgorithmWirelessMathematicsComputer networkTelecommunicationsTransmitterEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we study the energy efficiency of secure communication in an underlay cognitive radio network (CRN). We first formulate an optimization problem to maximize the secrecy energy efficiency (SEE) while meeting the quality-of-service (QoS) requirement for the primary user and the transmit power constraint at each base station. Since the problem is non-convex and very difficult to solve, we then convert the original fractional form into a subtractive one, and adopt the difference of two-convex functions (D.C.) approximation method to obtain an equivalent convex problem. Furthermore, a two-layer iterative algorithm is presented to solve the problem and obtain the optimal beamforming (BF) weight vectors. Finally, numerical results are provided to demonstrate the superiority of the proposed scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.350

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it