MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2399700293 · doi:10.1115/1.4033707

An Investigation of Multi-Injection Strategies for a Dual-Fuel Pilot Diesel Ignition Engine at Low Load

2016· article· en· W2399700293 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Energy Resources Technology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAmirkabir University of TechnologyUniversity of Manitoba
KeywordsNOxFuel injectionDiesel engineMaterials scienceIgnition systemCombustionDiesel fuelCommon railThermal efficiencyAutomotive engineeringEnvironmental scienceNuclear engineeringChemistryThermodynamicsPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A multidimensional computational fluid dynamic (CFD) model was developed in order to explore the combined effect of injection timing and fuels quantity ratio of different injection strategies on the combustion performance and emissions characteristics of a dual-fuel indirect injection (IDI) engine with a pilot diesel ignition. The total mass of pilot diesel and premixed natural gas equivalence ratio were kept constant while various injection strategies (single, double, and triple) were investigated at 25% engine load and speed of 800 rpm. Results revealed that the released heat of triple injection pulse during the expansion stroke is the same or higher than that of single and double injection pulses at specified injection timings. It affects positively the engine performance. The highest indicated mean effective pressure (IMEP) can be achieved using single injection pulse at all first injection timings. It is observed that double and triple injection pulses possess comparable indicated thermal efficiency (ITE) and IMEP to those of single injection at specified injection timings. The highest ITE is found 47.5% at first injection timing of −16 deg after top dead center (ATDC) for both single and double injection pulses. Nitrogen oxides (NOx) mole fraction generally increases when retarding the injection timing. By applying double and triple injection pulses, NOx emissions decrease, on average, by 9% and 14% compared to that of the single injection pulse. Using double and triple injection pulses, soot emissions increase, on average, by 10% and 32%, respectively, compared to single injection pulse. However, at specified injection timings, the effect of all injection pulses on soot emissions is negligible at relative advanced first injection timing. Carbon monoxide (CO) emissions decrease slightly for all injection strategies when the injection timing varies from −20 deg ATDC to −12 deg ATDC. In this range, dual-fuel operation with triple injection pulse produces the lowest CO emissions. By using triple injection pulse at suitable injection timings, CO emissions decrease by around 7.4% compared to single injection pulse. However, by applying double and triple injection pulses, unburned methane increases, on average, by 16% and 52%, respectively, compared with that of single injection pulse. However, at injection timings of −12 deg ATDC and −8 deg ATDC, triple and double injection pulses produce comparable level of unburned methane to that of single injection pulse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.377
Threshold uncertainty score0.658

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it