MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2399750592

Value Cocreation Modeling: Supporting the Analysis and Design of B2B Service Engagements through Agent Orientation and Business Intelligence.

2014· article· en· W2399750592 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueiStar · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicService and Product Innovation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsService (business)Knowledge managementService-orientationBusiness intelligenceComputer scienceKey (lock)Business modelValue (mathematics)Process managementBusinessMarketingComputer security
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Current modeling approaches for designing services do not address the characteristics of collaborative business-to-business (B2B) service engagements. Yet, these types of service engagements, for example R&D services and other knowledge-intensive business services, are key components of industrialized economies. We identify the requirements of a modeling technique able to support the analysis and design of these types of service engagements. We briefly describe Value cocreation modeling (VCM), a modeling technique fulfilling these requirements, with an emphasis on value cocreation. VCM draws concepts and constructs from i*, an agent-oriented modeling language, and business intelligence modeling. We briefly illustrate the use of VCM in an R&D service engagement, discuss its limitations, and outline opportunities for

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.449
Threshold uncertainty score0.436

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it