MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2399796084

Visualizing Stock Market Data with Self-Organizing Map.

2013· article· en· W2399796084 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Florida AI Research Society · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Visualization and Analytics
Canadian institutionsMacEwan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCluster analysisSelf-organizing mapComputer scienceVisualizationStock marketData visualizationStock (firearms)Unsupervised learningData miningData scienceArtificial intelligenceEngineeringGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Finding useful patterns in stock market data requires tremendous analytical skills and effort. To help investors manage their portfolios, we developed a tool for clustering and visualizing stock market data using an unsupervised learning algorithm called Self-Organizing Map. Our tool is intended to assist users in identifying groups of stocks that have similar price movement patterns over a period of time. We performed a visual analysis by comparing the resulting visualization with Yahoo Finance charts. Overall, we found that the Self-Organizing Map algorithm can analyze and cluster the stock market data reasonably.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.817
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0050.004
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it