Time-Controlled Transcardiac Perfusion Crosslinking for In Vivo Interactome Studies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The time-controlled transcardiac perfusion crosslinking (tcTPC) method differs from conventional perfusion fixation in that the crosslinking reagent is administered throughout the circulatory system for only a relatively short period of time, thereby allowing limited crosslinking to occur. Bait protein complexes are isolated by affinity capture (AC) under stringent conditions and are recovered from the AC matrix by acidic elution. Affinity-purified proteins are reduced, alkylated, and digested with a specific endoproteinase, such as trypsin. Subsequently, peptides are isotopically labeled, separated by reversed-phase chromatography and analyzed by quantitative tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). The proteins crosslinked to the bait protein during tcTPC are identified by database searches with conventional protein identification software. The tcTPC strategy offers unique advantages over alternative approaches for studying a subset of protein complexes which require a particular environment for their structural integrity, such as membrane protein complexes that are notorious for their tendency to dissociate upon detergent solubilization. The sensitivity and utility of this method are influenced by the spatial distribution of chemical groups within the bait protein complexes that can engage in productive crosslinks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".