MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2399933443

ALTERNATIVES IN NETWORK TRANSPORT PROTOCOLS FOR AUDIO STREAMING APPLICATIONS

2013· article· en· W2399933443 on OpenAlexaff
Flávio Luiz Schiavoni, Marcelo Gomes de Queiróz, Marcelo M. Wanderley

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer network
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Audio streaming is often pictured as a networking application that is not concerned with packet loss or data integrity, but is otherwise very latency-sensitive.However, some usage scenarios may be identified, such as remote recording, that shift concerns towards more conservative views regarding stream integrity.Although many streaming applications today use the UDP protocol, there are some alternative transport layer protocols that are worth investigating, especially in applications other than Voice-over-IP (VoIP) or live distributed performance.This paper compares audio streaming in local-area computer networks over four different transport protocols on the TCP/IP stack: TCP, UDP, STCP and DCCP.Each of these protocols and their features will be discussed, first from a theoretical point-of-view, and then through experimental results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.010
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Abraham Lincoln AssociationSame topicNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlFrench-language works237,207