Les infections transmises sexuellement chez les adolescents : maximiser les occasions de soins optimaux
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les infections transmises sexuellement sont une préoccupation croissante en santé publique au Canada. Les taux de l’infection par la Chlamydia trachomatis, la gonorrhée et la syphilis sont à la hausse chez les adolescents et les jeunes adultes. Le présent point de pratique expose l’épidémiologie, les facteurs de risque, les tests de laboratoire et la prise en charge de la C trachomatis, de la Neisseriagonorrhoeae et du Treponemapallidum, et aborde au passage le VIH. Les auteurs traitent de la nécessité du contrôle de guérison et des indications d’examens plus approfondis. Ils soulignent l’importance de maximiser les occasions de dépistage et de traiter les infections transmises sexuellement au sein de ce groupe d’âge. Les infections transmises sexuellement (ITS) sont une préoccupation croissante en santé publique au Canada, où les taux de détection de l’infection par la Chlamydia trachomatis, la syphilis et la gonorrhée chez les adolescents et les jeunes adultes ont augmenté depuis dix ans.[1],[2]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".