MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2400099212

ITNLP Entity Linking System at TAC 2013.

2013· article· en· W2400099212 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yaming Sun, Xianqi Zou, Lei Lin, Chengjie Sun

Bibliographic record

VenueTheory and applications of categories · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNatural Language Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceRanking (information retrieval)Cluster analysisEntity linkingInformation retrievalSet (abstract data type)Knowledge baseTask (project management)Rank (graph theory)PopulationArtificial intelligenceProcess (computing)Hierarchical clusteringData miningNatural language processingMathematicsEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes the ITNLP system participated in the Knowledge Base Population (KBP) track English Entity Linking task. Our Entity linking system is composed of three parts: candidate generation, candidate ranking and nil clustering. In the candidate generation process, the redirect pages and anchor texts in Wikipedia are utilized to generate candidate entities for the mentions. Ranking SVM is adopted to rank the candidates by a set of linguistic features. In the end, the hierarchical clustering algorithm is used to cluster those queries which return NIL in the ranking process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.138

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.008
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0410.041

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTheory and applications of categoriesSame topicNatural Language Processing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207