Bibliographic record
Abstract
Following a myocardial infarction (MI), fibroblasts differentiate to myofibroblasts, which possess some of the characteristics of smooth muscle cells (SMCs) and contribute to wound healing. Previous studies suggested that the miR-143/-145 cluster plays a critical role in SMC differentiation. Therefore, we determined whether miR-145 promoted differentiation of cardiac fibroblasts to myofibroblasts. Following coronary occlusion in mice, myocardial miR-145 expression was downregulated at 3 days but was restored at 7 days. In vitro studies showed that hypoxia also downregulated miR-145 in cardiac fibroblasts. The number of α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) positive cells in fibroblast cultures was employed to determine their transdifferentiation to cardiac myofibroblasts and was increased by 73.5% after transient transfection with miR-145. Ultrastructural analysis of α-SMA stress fibers revealed that ~95% of the α-SMA(+) cells treated with miR-145 organized their actin-filament bundles with a specific orientation compared to only 15% in the scrambled control group. This orientation of the SMA bundles and their integration with the filamentous actin fibers of the cytoskeleton permit infarct wound contraction. Structural and functional studies showed that miR-145 induced a myofibroblast phenotype, and miR-145 also potentiated the production of mature collagen by myofibroblasts. Repression of KLF5, a target of miR-145, was validated by a chimeric luciferase construct tagged with the full-length 3'-UTR of KLF5. A dramatic decrease in KLF5 and a corresponding increase in myocardin expression were observed after transfecting cultured fibroblasts with miR-145. Similar results were found in vivo: the transient decrease in miR-145 expression 3 days post-MI was associated with an increase in KLF5 and a decrease in myocardin. In addition, in vivo delivery of a miR-145 antagomir 1 day prior to and 2 and 6 days after MI decreased myofibroblast formation and increased scar size. The antagomir also reversed the suppressed expression of KLF5 protein in the scar region at day 7 after MI. In summary, we describe a novel association between miR-145 and fibroblast differentiation toward myofibroblasts. These observations provide a new approach to promote endogenous scar healing and contracture by stimulating the transdifferentiation of cardiac fibroblasts to myofibroblasts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".