Dynamic Multi-Resource Monitoring for Predictive Job Scheduling with ScoPro.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Modern job schedulers move towards applying dynamic approaches like time sharing or adaptive resource allocation to accommodate grid jobs or to better utilize local resources. Also, the resources may be heterogeneous and a proper distribution of the application's workload be hard to estimate. Our ScoPro monitoring tool permits to obtain and to store resource-related behavior information for parallel applications. This information is used to create an application signature for predictive use in future runs and to dynamically check competition under time-shared execution and imbalances of workload on heterogeneous resources. ScoPro is applicable to production runs on standard clusters. As main innovative contributions ScoPro can be triggered by job-scheduling events, can monitor several coscheduled jobs concurrently for accurate prediction of slowdowns, and performs realtime short-period measurements with low intrusion during the monitoring, while avoiding any intrusion overhead for the non-monitored part of the job execution
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it