MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W240029411

America's Regional and Bilateral Free Trade Agreements

2007· article· en· W240029411 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCompetition Forum · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal trade and economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCustoms unionInternational free trade agreementFree tradeEconomic integrationInternational tradeTrade diversionSingle marketTrade barrierEuropean unionEconomicsInternational economicsTrade agreementMarket accessBilateral tradeOrder (exchange)Economic unionPolitical scienceChinaFinanceGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A major trend in the global economic environment since the end of World War II is the formation of trading blocs. The most well-known trading bloc in the world is the European Union, which has 27 member nations today. Nations form or join such trading blocs in order to achieve faster economic growth and stay globally competitive. This paper provides a concise and up-to-date report on the United States' and bilateral free trade agreements that have been implemented as of mid-2007. Keywords: economic integration, free trade agreement, NAFTA, FTAA, CAFTA-DR INTRODUCTION The term regional economic integration (REI) refers to a group of countries (usually in the same region) linking their economies together for the purpose of achieving a higher level of economic performance that will benefit all the participating members. REI can take four basic forms: (1) free trade agreement (abolition of trade barriers among member nations); (2) customs union (a free trade agreement plus common trade barriers for non-member nations); (3) common market (a customs union plus free flow of labor, capital and other production factors); and (4) economic union (a common market plus unification/harmonization of economic institutions and policies). Like several other complicated matters that are easily subjected to misinformation, miscommunication, and misunderstanding, REI is a controversial issue. REI's supporters focus on its benefits, such as a bigger and more attractive market, job creation, economies of scale in production and distribution, lower prices for customers to pay. The United States Trade Representative (USTR) Office states (2007a; 2007b): Trade is essential to America's economic growth, high standard of living, and job creation in the states. The U.S. is the world's largest trading nation, exporting nearly $1.3 trillion in goods and services in 2005. Over one-fifth of the growth in U.S. GDP depended on exports in 2005. Domestically, manufacturing exports supported an estimated 5.2 million jobs (in 2002 - latest data), including 1 in 5 manufacturing jobs. Jobs supported by goods exports pay 13-18% higher than the average wage. .. .Additionally, more than 5.1 million Americans have insourced jobs, drawing their paychecks from U.S. subsidiaries of overseas-based companies (as of 2004)... .The U.S. trade strategy is to pursue multiple market-opening initiatives on a global, and bilateral basis, establishing models of success that can be used throughout all negotiations. REI's opponents emphasize its problems, including the relocation of factories from high-wage countries to low-wage countries, a slow wage growth in high-wage countries, and rising income inequality in high-wage countries (Walker, 2007). The objective of this paper is to provide a concise and up-to-date report on the United States' and bilateral free trade agreements. Because free trade agreements can exert a gigantic impact on the economy of the United States for many years to come, the contents of this paper should be of high interest and value to government officials, business executives, and economics and business scholars. AMERICA'S REGIONAL FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) The Canada-United States Free Trade Agreement (CUFTA) took effect on January 1, 1989. Then President George H. Bush formally proposed creation of a free trade area for the Western Hemisphere in his Enterprise of the Americas initiative in June 1990. His administration laid the groundwork for expanding CUFTA to include Mexico. President Clinton apparently liked the idea of developing a Western Hemisphere free trade area. With his strong support, NAFTA was passed by Congress in late 1993 and put into effect on January 1, 1994. The three NAFTA members are Canada, Mexico and the United States. NAFTA eliminated the tariffs on most products traded, phased out other tariffs gradually, removed trade and investment restrictions, and strengthened the protection of intellectual property rights (patents, copyrights, and trademarks) among its members. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.768
Threshold uncertainty score0.504

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it