MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W240029411

America's Regional and Bilateral Free Trade Agreements

2007· article· en· W240029411 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueCompetition Forum · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueGlobal trade and economics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCustoms unionInternational free trade agreementFree tradeEconomic integrationInternational tradeTrade diversionSingle marketTrade barrierEuropean unionEconomicsInternational economicsTrade agreementMarket accessBilateral tradeOrder (exchange)Economic unionPolitical scienceChinaFinanceGeography
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A major trend in the global economic environment since the end of World War II is the formation of trading blocs. The most well-known trading bloc in the world is the European Union, which has 27 member nations today. Nations form or join such trading blocs in order to achieve faster economic growth and stay globally competitive. This paper provides a concise and up-to-date report on the United States' and bilateral free trade agreements that have been implemented as of mid-2007. Keywords: economic integration, free trade agreement, NAFTA, FTAA, CAFTA-DR INTRODUCTION The term regional economic integration (REI) refers to a group of countries (usually in the same region) linking their economies together for the purpose of achieving a higher level of economic performance that will benefit all the participating members. REI can take four basic forms: (1) free trade agreement (abolition of trade barriers among member nations); (2) customs union (a free trade agreement plus common trade barriers for non-member nations); (3) common market (a customs union plus free flow of labor, capital and other production factors); and (4) economic union (a common market plus unification/harmonization of economic institutions and policies). Like several other complicated matters that are easily subjected to misinformation, miscommunication, and misunderstanding, REI is a controversial issue. REI's supporters focus on its benefits, such as a bigger and more attractive market, job creation, economies of scale in production and distribution, lower prices for customers to pay. The United States Trade Representative (USTR) Office states (2007a; 2007b): Trade is essential to America's economic growth, high standard of living, and job creation in the states. The U.S. is the world's largest trading nation, exporting nearly $1.3 trillion in goods and services in 2005. Over one-fifth of the growth in U.S. GDP depended on exports in 2005. Domestically, manufacturing exports supported an estimated 5.2 million jobs (in 2002 - latest data), including 1 in 5 manufacturing jobs. Jobs supported by goods exports pay 13-18% higher than the average wage. .. .Additionally, more than 5.1 million Americans have insourced jobs, drawing their paychecks from U.S. subsidiaries of overseas-based companies (as of 2004)... .The U.S. trade strategy is to pursue multiple market-opening initiatives on a global, and bilateral basis, establishing models of success that can be used throughout all negotiations. REI's opponents emphasize its problems, including the relocation of factories from high-wage countries to low-wage countries, a slow wage growth in high-wage countries, and rising income inequality in high-wage countries (Walker, 2007). The objective of this paper is to provide a concise and up-to-date report on the United States' and bilateral free trade agreements. Because free trade agreements can exert a gigantic impact on the economy of the United States for many years to come, the contents of this paper should be of high interest and value to government officials, business executives, and economics and business scholars. AMERICA'S REGIONAL FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) The Canada-United States Free Trade Agreement (CUFTA) took effect on January 1, 1989. Then President George H. Bush formally proposed creation of a free trade area for the Western Hemisphere in his Enterprise of the Americas initiative in June 1990. His administration laid the groundwork for expanding CUFTA to include Mexico. President Clinton apparently liked the idea of developing a Western Hemisphere free trade area. With his strong support, NAFTA was passed by Congress in late 1993 and put into effect on January 1, 1994. The three NAFTA members are Canada, Mexico and the United States. NAFTA eliminated the tariffs on most products traded, phased out other tariffs gradually, removed trade and investment restrictions, and strengthened the protection of intellectual property rights (patents, copyrights, and trademarks) among its members. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,768
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,504

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,044
Tête enseignante GPT0,210
Écart entre enseignants0,166 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle