Responsabilité juridique, incertitude scientifique et santé publique : de la science au droit
Bibliographic record
Abstract
courante avant au moins cinq ans.Pour sa part, le gouvernement britannique donna tout de suite son accord à la formation d'un comité consultatif chargé de définir le cadre dans lequel pourraient être élaborées des normes éthiques applicables à l'expérimentation dans le domaine des xénogreffes 1 .Rien n'indiquait, à première vue, si les types de comités existants allaient ou non pouvoir suffire à la tâche (qu'il s'agisse d'éthique de l'expérimentation animale ou de protection des sujets humains).Il nous manque encore des données sur ce que la société et les mentalités actuelles permettent, dans le contexte d'une mise au point des xénogreffes, en matière 1 DICKSON, David, «Pig Heart Transplant "Breakthrough" Stirs Debate Over Timing of Trials», Nature, 21 septembre 1995, 6546, p. 185-186.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.028 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.095 | 0.022 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".