La perte d'une partie de soi dans le contexte d'une amputation traumatique de guerre : Un deuil impossible?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article, the authors explore the subjective experience of an adult subjectamputated during his teenage years following a traumatic accident of war. Eleven semi-structured clinical interviews were conducted and analyzedusing psychoanalytic theory and principles. A projective test was alsoadministered. This research has helped identify how the absence of anyadequate and real support during war, prevented this subject from integratingthis extreme experience. Forced to absolute silence, he finds himselfin a painful stalemate, unable to reconstruct his broken identity after thistraumatic event. In order to survive this accident, he psychically amputatespart of himself, which allows him to guard against the emergence of difficultand painful emotions related to the loss of the body image he had of himselfbefore the amputation. But this psychological amputation that manifestsitself through a painful identity conflict, prevents him from undergoing agrieving process and therefore possibly symbolizing this traumatic event. Inthe context that surrounds him, investing in horses appears to be his onlyhope of repairing the narcissistic injury related to his traumatic amputation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it