MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2400524579 · doi:10.7202/1036334ar

L’intimidation envers les personnes aînées : un problème social connexe à la maltraitance ?

2016· article· fr· W2400524579 on OpenAlex
Marie Beaulieu, Marie-Ève Bédard, Roxane Leboeuf

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueService social · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicElder Abuse and Neglect
Canadian institutionsFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéHealth and Social Services Centre University Institute of Geriatrics of SherbrookeFonds de recherche du QuébecUniversité de MontréalUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesIntimidationPolitical sciencePhilosophyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La lutte contre l’intimidation au Québec survient comme une nouvelle priorité gouvernementale quatre ans après l’adoption du premier Plan d’action gouvernemental pour contrer la maltraitance envers les personnes aînées . Cet article fait suite à notre mémoire sur l’intimidation envers les personnes aînées publié dans le cadre d’une consultation publique sur le sujet. Il vise à approfondir la réflexion théorique et conceptuelle, alors amorcée, sur la différence entre la maltraitance et l’intimidation envers les personnes aînées afin de les distinguer clairement. Ce processus réflexif permet de proposer une définition de ce qu’est l’intimidation envers les personnes aînées, ainsi qu’un schéma conceptuel de la dynamique de ces situations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.632
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it