MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2400647090

Canada and Brazil. Health satisfaction older adults.

2006· article· en· W2400647090 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAging, Health, and Disability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLikert scaleDescriptive statisticsGerontologyData collectionScale (ratio)PsychologyQuality of life (healthcare)MedicineGeographySociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare patterns of social factors explaining health satisfaction of older adults in selected regions of Canada and Brazil. DESIGN: The study was a secondary analysis of data from two descriptive exploratory studies of quality of life of older adults in Canada and Brazil. METHODS: A secondary analysis of two data sets was conducted. The data sets included responses from 202 older adults from Canada and 288 older adults from Brazil. The Canadian data were collected in a mail survey of randomly selected older adults conducted in early 2004 and the Brazilian data were collected in a household survey in the fall of 2004. In both countries, instruments used in data collection were the short version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF) and a demographic data sheet. Multiple regression analyses were used to examine predictors of health satisfaction in each of the samples. The independent variables were: age, gender, perceptions of access to health services, transport, social support, personal relationships, capacity for work, opportunities for leisure activities and enough money to meet needs. All indicators (except for age and gender) were taken from the WHOQOL-BREF instrument and were measured by a single global item on a five point Likert scale. FINDINGS: In the Canadian data set, it was found that perceptions regarding capacity to work and opportunities for leisure activities were significant predictors of health satisfaction. In Brazil, the significant predictors were perceptions of capacity to work and enough money to meet needs. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies some common social factors that explain health satisfaction, but many other variables thought to be important were not significant in these samples. Examination of social factors influencing health at the individual as well as societal level may help in planning interventions that enhance health and well-being of older adults.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.262
Threshold uncertainty score0.261

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it