Interprofessional student-run primary health care clinics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Student-run primary health care clinics (SRPHCCs) are prevalent in the United States and have reported benefits not only by providing medical care for underserved patients but also by acting as a valuable learning experience for medical students. 1There are currently 7 SRPHCCs in Canada. 2 The Community Health Initiative by University Students (CHIUS) in Vancouver, British Columbia, was the first to open its doors in April 2000.Subsequently, 6 additional SRPHCCs have opened in Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Ontario. 2 These Canadian student-run primary health care clinics offer medical services that are similar to those available in typical family doctors' offices; however, most patients of the SRPHCCs seek care on a walk-in basis, in contrast to appointment-based encounters.What makes these SRPHCCs unique (in addition to the fact that they are operated by students) is that they use a collaborative, interprofessional approach and that patients can access a wide variety of educational and social services at the clinics, not exclusively medical care.The purpose of this article is to describe the function of interprofessional SRPHCCs in Canada and to discuss potential benefits of the model for educating undergraduate pharmacy students.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".