MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2400984493 · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.35770

Development of a nanofibrous wound dressing with an antifibrogenic properties <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> model

2016· article· en· W2400984493 on OpenAlexafffund
Malihe‐Sadat Poormasjedi‐Meibod, Mohammadreza Pakyari, John K. Jackson, Sanam Salimi Elizei, Aziz Ghahary

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCalifornia HIV/AIDS Research Program
KeywordsMaterials scienceIn vivoComposite materialIn vitroBiomedical engineeringWound dressingMedicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dermal fibrosis, characterized by excessive extracellular matrix (ECM), is a pathological condition with limited effective therapeutic modalities. Lack of an antiscarring dressing further impedes the preventive measures for this condition. Here, we develop a new antiscarring dressing and investigate its potential as a slow-releasing vehicle for kynurenic acid (KynA), an antifibrotic agent. KynA was incorporated into polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) nanofibers, containing increasing concentration of polyethylene glycol (PEG). Fibre morphology, water absorption capacity, surface hydrophilicity, in vitro drug release profile, and in vivo antifibrotic effects were investigated. Increasing concentrations of PEG (1-20%) significantly increased surface hydrophilicity, water absorption capacity, and drug release. Based on the obtained release profiles, PMMA + 10% PEG was the preferred formulation for sustained KynA release up to 120 hours. In vitro studies confirmed the preservation of KynA antifibrotic properties during electrospinning, indicated by fibroblasts proliferation suppression and ECM expression modulation. In vivo application of KynA-incorporated films significantly inhibited collagen (23.89 ± 4.79 vs. 6.99 ± 0.41, collagen-I/β-actin mRNA expression, control vs. treated) and fibronectin expression (7.18 ± 1.09 vs. 2.31 ± 0.05, fibronectin/β-actin mRNA expression, control vs. treated) and enhanced the production of an ECM-degrading enzyme (2.03 ± 0.88 vs. 11.88 ± 1.16 MMP-1/β-actin mRNA expression, control vs. treated). The fabricated KynA-incorporated films can be exploited as antifibrotic wound dressings. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 104A: 2334-2344, 2016.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.551

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biomedical Materials Research Part ASame topicElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207