MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2401258374 · doi:10.1021/jm200452d

Matched Molecular Pairs as a Medicinal Chemistry Tool

2011· article· en· W2401258374 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ed Griffen, Andrew G. Leach, Graeme R. Robb, Daniel J. Warner

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medicinal Chemistry · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicClick Chemistry and Applications
Canadian institutionsAstraZeneca (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitationLibrary scienceChemistryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPerspectiveNEXTMatched Molecular Pairs as a Medicinal Chemistry ToolMiniperspectiveEd Griffen‡, Andrew G. Leach*§, Graeme R. Robb§, and Daniel J. Warner∥View Author Information‡ Oncology Innovative Medicines Unit, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Mereside, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, SK10 4TG, U.K.§ Cardiovascular and Gastrointestinal Innovative Medicines Unit, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, 30S373 Mereside, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, SK10 4TG, U.K.∥ Department of Medicinal Chemistry, AstraZeneca R&D Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, H4S 1Z9, CanadaPhone: +44 1625 231853. E-mail: [email protected]Cite this: J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 22, 7739–7750Publication Date (Web):September 22, 2011Publication History Received14 April 2011Published online22 September 2011Published inissue 24 November 2011https://doi.org/10.1021/jm200452dCopyright © 2011 American Chemical SocietyRIGHTS & PERMISSIONSArticle Views7157Altmetric-Citations197LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InReddit Read OnlinePDF (3 MB) Get e-AlertsSUBJECTS:Assays,Mathematical methods,Molecules,Solubility,Structure activity relationship Get e-Alerts

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.234
Threshold uncertainty score0.783

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.006
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2340.100

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations287
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medicinal ChemistrySame topicClick Chemistry and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207