MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2401329647 · doi:10.12968/johv.2016.4.5.238

Egg allergy in children under the age of 5 years

2016· article· en· W2401329647 on OpenAlexaff
Rachel De Boer, Ruth Chalmers, George Du Toit

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Health Visiting · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEgg allergyAllergyFood allergyAtopic dermatitisAtopyMedicinePediatricsMilk allergyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Egg allergy is the second most common food allergy in infants and young children after cows' milk allergy ( Caubet and Wang, 2011 ). It usually presents within the first year of life after initial exposure to egg protein. The presence of atopic dermatitis is a significant risk factor for egg allergy, as is the presence of atopy ( Clark et al, 2010 ). Fortunately, egg allergy typically resolves during childhood ( Sicherer et al, 2014 ), although rates of tolerance acquisition vary depending on different study cohorts. This article will look at how egg allergy can be managed through dietary avoidance. Parents of egg-allergic children should be educated on the appropriate level of restriction required for their child, as many infants and children will tolerate baked or well-cooked egg at diagnosis while still reacting to loosely cooked, plain and raw egg, while others will need to avoid egg altogether. It is useful for families and older patients to be informed about the importance of reading food labels, hidden sources of egg and appropriate alternatives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Health VisitingSame topicFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis ResearchFrench-language works237,207