Radioactive Labeling of Mitochondrial Translation Products in Cultured Cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mammalian mitochondrial genome contains 37 genes, 13 of which encode polypeptide subunits in the enzyme complexes of the oxidative phosphorylation system. The other genes encode the rRNAs and tRNAs necessary for their translation. The mitochondrial translation machinery is located in the mitochondrial matrix, and is exclusively dedicated to the synthesis of these 13 enzyme subunits. Mitochondrial disease in humans is often associated with defects in mitochondrial translation. This can manifest as a global decrease in the rate of mitochondrial protein synthesis, a decrease in the synthesis of specific polypeptides, the synthesis of abnormal polypeptides, or in altered stability of specific translation products. All of these changes in the normal pattern of mitochondrial translation can be assessed by a straightforward technique that takes advantage of the insensitivity of the mitochondrial translation machinery to antibiotics that completely inhibit cytoplasmic translation. Thus, specific radioactive labeling of the mitochondrial translation products can be achieved in cultured cells, and the results can be visualized on gradient gels. The analysis of mitochondrial translation in cells cultured from patient biopsies is useful in the study of disease-causing mutations in both the mitochondrial and the nuclear genomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Methods About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Bench or experimental | low |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Methods About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Bench or experimental | high |
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedLabeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".