MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2401353505

Fisherman learning algorithm of the SOM realized in the CMOS technology

2011· article· en· W2401353505 on OpenAlex
Rafał Długosz, Marta Kolasa, Witold Pedrycz

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRealization (probability)Computer scienceAdaptation (eye)Process (computing)SoftwareSelf-organizing mapAlgorithmTransistorArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural networkMathematicsEngineeringElectrical engineeringProgramming language
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study presents an idea of transistor level realization of the sherman learning algorithm of Self-Organizing Maps (SOMs) which is described in (4). The realization of this algorithm in hardware calls for a solution of several specic problems not present in software implementa- tion. The main problem is related to an iterative nature of the adaptation process of the neighboring neurons positioned at particular rings surround- ing the winning neuron. This makes the circuit structure of the SOM very complex. To come up with a feasible realization, we introduce some mod- ications to the original sherman algorithm. Detailed simulations of the software model of the SOM show that these modications do not have the negative impact on the learning process, and helps bring signicant reduc- tion of the circuit complexity. In consequence, a fully parallel adaptation of all neurons is possible, which makes the SOM very fast.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.871
Threshold uncertainty score0.564

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it