Comment Blachere Compiled the Qur'an and Its Relation to the Assignment of Distorting the Quran (Reviews and Criticism)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Régis blachère, French orientalist believes in the intellectual life of the Prophet and the Quran in the time of writing it after the death of his era and the era of Abu Bakr and Umar attributed, based on the full written judgment and personal discretion together and create some changes in some verses of the compromise revelation made manifest. In terms of Quran Blachere era of the Prophet because of ignorance of the Prophet, descent successive verses and negligence Prophet in this case is not written and the total sum for the mind and memory as well.But after his death, the disruptions are done in writing and writing. Given the lack of a copy of the written revelation companions formed in different ways and eventually entered distortions and changes in the Holy Qur'an. Blachere vote, even though the facts at issue in the era of the Companions of the Quran does not specify but to jet the Firstly total Quran in the era of the Prophet as subjective, and secondly, unilaterally from Sunni sources Shia and deprived of rich resources and Thirdly entry in the Qur'an was distorted is serious criticism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".