MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2401462732 · doi:10.4244/eijv10sua17

Transcatheter mitral valve implantation with Tiara bioprosthesis

2014· article· en· W2401462732 on OpenAlex
Anson Cheung, Dion Stub, Robert Moss, Robert Boone, Jonathon Leipsic, Stefan Verheye, Shmuel Banai, John G. Webb

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuroIntervention · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMitral regurgitationPercutaneousMitral valveSurgeryCardiologyMitral valve repairInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mitral valve surgery is the gold standard therapy for severe mitral regurgitation, but can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Percutaneous mitral leaflet repair has recently been established as a viable alternative to surgery, but many patients are ineligible and repair may not be optimal. Transcatheter mitral valve implantation may be an alternate therapeutic option, particularly for high-risk patients. We outline the initial preclinical and first-in-human experience with the Tiara transapical mitral valve implantation system, highlighting the ease of implantation, proven feasibility and excellent haemodynamic performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.305

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it