Products of Admissible Monomials in the Polynomial Algebra as a Module over the Steenrod Algebra
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Let ${\P}(n) ={\F}[x_1,\ldots,x_n]$ be the polynomial algebra in $n$ variables $x_i$, of degree one, over the field $\F$ of two elements. The mod-2 Steenrod algebra $\A$ acts on ${\P }(n)$ according to well known rules. A major problem in algebraic topology is that of determining $\A^+{\P}(n)$, the image of the action of the positively graded part of $\A$. We are interested in the related problem of determining a basis for the quotient vector space ${\Q}(n) = {\P}(n)/\A^{+}\P(n)$. Both ${\P }(n) =\bigoplus_{d \geq 0} {\P}^{d}(n)$ and ${\Q}(n)$ are graded, where ${\P}^{d}(n)$ denotes the set of homogeneous polynomials of degree $d$. ${\Q}(n)$ has been explicitly calculated for $n=1,2,3,4$ but problems remain for $n \geq 5.$ In this note we show that if $u = x_{1}^{m_1} \cdots x_{k}^{m_{k}} \in {\P}^{d}(k)$ and $v = x_{1}^{e_1} \cdots x_{r}^{e_{r}} \in {\P}^{d'}(r)$ are an admissible monomials, (that is, $u$ and $v$ meet a criterion to be in a certain basis for ${\Q}(k)$ and ${\Q}(r)$ respectively), then for each permutation $\sigma \in S_{k+r}$ for which $\sigma(i)<\sigma(j),$ $i<j\leq k$ and $\sigma(s)<\sigma(t),$ $k<s<t\leq k+r,$ the monomial $x_{\sigma(1)}^{m_1} \cdots x_{\sigma(k)}^{m_{k}} x_{\sigma(k+1)}^{e_1} \cdots x_{\sigma(k+r)}^{e_r} \in {\P}^{d+d'}(k+r)$ is admissible. As an application we consider a few cases when $n=5.$
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".