Live Cell Imaging of Argonaute Proteins in Mammalian Cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The central effector of mammalian RNA interference (RNAi) is the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). Proteins of the Argonaute family are the core components of RISC. Recent work from multiple laboratories has shown that Argonaute family members are associated with at least two types of cytoplasmic RNA granules: GW/Processing bodies and stress granules. These Argonaute-containing granules harbor proteins that function in mRNA degradation and translational repression in response to stress. The known role of Argonaute proteins in miRNA-mediated translational repression and siRNA-directed mRNA cleavage (i.e., Argonaute 2) has prompted speculation that the association of Argonautes with these granules may reflect the activity of RNAi in vivo. Accordingly, studying the dynamic association between Argonautes and RNA granules in living cells will undoubtedly provide insight into the regulatory mechanisms of RNA-based silencing. This chapter describes a method for imaging fluorescently tagged Argonaute proteins in living mammalian cells using spinning disk confocal microscopy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".