MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2402146430 · doi:10.1061/9780784479827.254

Predictive and Diagnostic Analysis of Shield Cutter Head Failures in Tunnel Construction

2016· article· en· W2402146430 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueConstruction Research Congress 2016 · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTunneling and Rock Mechanics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShieldHead (geology)Computer scienceForensic engineeringGeologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Shield cutter head failures exist in almost every tunnel project. A systematic approach that incorporates dynamic fault tree (DFT) and discrete-time Bayesian network (DTBN) is developed in this research, in order to facilitate the analysis for shield cutter head failures in tunnel construction. A causal network model is built to simulate the behaviors of shield cutter head failures over time during the tunnel boring machine (TBM) operation. One of the tunneling projects recently completed in the Wuhan metro system in China is selected as a case study to demonstrate the applicability of the developed approach. Results indicate that the developed approach is capable of predictive analysis for the estimation of the TBM performance, and diagnostic analysis in case a low performance or a failure is observed. This approach provides a powerful potential solution to modeling and analyzing various kinds of system components behaviors and interactions in a complex project environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.486
Threshold uncertainty score0.427

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it