Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION. Twenty-one species of Gaura (Evening Primrose family, Onagraceae) are native to North America (Carr, et al., 1990). Gaura translates as gorgeous or superb and is commonly sold with the same common name. Most species are found in the southwestern region of the U.S. and, consequently, are drought/heat tolerant, providing continuous flowering throughout the growing season (reportedly a day-neutral plant). Other species are constituents of prairie communities, e.g. G. coccinea in Minnesota and Canada. Some species, G. drummondii, are fragrant, night-bloomers (Shaver, et al., 1997). Gaura lindheimeri Engelm. & Gray have been described as “extremely graceful and a longblooming plant” (Gardens North, 1999). Each plant sports spikes of delicate flowers, providing constant color throughout the summer and late into the fall for northern gardeners. If grown as an annual, it will flower from July through October from seed in the first year. Since perennial Gaura species have deep tap roots, good drainage is imperative for stand establishment and increased winter survival. The most popular cultivars on the market are G. lindheimeri ‘Siskiyou Pink’ (light pink flowers) and ‘Whirling Butterflies’ (white flowers), both reported to be selections from populations collected in the wild (Siskiyou Nursery, 1999). Other new vegetatively-propagated cultivars have recently been introduced, including 'Dauphine', 'Corrie's Gold' (Siskiyou Nursery, 1999), 'Crimson Butterflies', 'Blushing Butterflies', and 'Sunny Butterflies' (Pride of Place Plants, 2000). One seed propagated cultivar, 'The Bride', is openpollinated (B&T World Seeds, 1999) and a flowering plant can be produced in 9+ weeks from seed (Nau, 1999). Gaura may be useful as a flowering potted plant, although no cultural work has been performed. The objective of this research was to conduct an initial forcing regime for gaura as a flowering potted plant to determine floriferousness and plant size with pinched/unpinched plants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".