[Central nervous system complications after coronary artery bypass grafting].
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective study was to review incidence of neurological and cognitive complications after coronary artery bypass graft surgery and find out predictive factors, associated with perioperative cerebral dysfunction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective pilot study of 35 (27 men and 8 women, mean age 64.5+/-4.3 year) patients with identified coronary artery disease was conducted using Case Report data collection document. All patients underwent isolated elective CABG procedure at Cardiac center of Kaunas University of Medicine Hospital. RESULTS: There were two cases (5.7%) of postoperative transient ischemic attack, two cases (5.7%) of restless agitation with delirium, characterised as an postoperative encephalopathy and eight patients (22.8%) with cognitive abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: The Canadian Stroke Scale and The Confusion Assessment Scale are sensitive and objective methods for diagnostics of postoperative neurological dysfunction. To characterize the incidence and severity of neuropsychological dysfunction, a concise battery of neuropsychologic tests that provides reliable evidence of subtle brain trauma should be used.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".