MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2402301099 · doi:10.1177/1750458915025001-202

Perceptions of the Assistant Theatre Practitioner Role: A View from My Ivory Tower

2015· article· en· W2402301099 on OpenAlex
Julie Weir

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Perioperative Practice · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSurgical Simulation and Training
Canadian institutionsHealth Care Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIvory towerAmbiguityAccountabilityDelegationSession (web analytics)Subject (documents)StaffingMedical educationScope of practicePsychologyPerceptionPublic relationsNursingPolitical scienceMedicineLawLibrary scienceBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

At a recent AfPP event, during a debating session amongst fellow perioperative practitioners, the role and remit of assistant theatre practitioner (ATP) was raised. The debating panel's views were sought from several quarters and the subject seemed to spark discussion and much 'harrumphing' in the audience. A recently qualified ATP, who, having spent an intensive two years studying for a foundation degree, expressed his frustration about on-going role ambiguity and the struggle to have his newly acquired knowledge and skills recognised in practice. As a heated discussion went around the room, polarised views were emergent, in particular themed around concerns about delegation, accountability and scope of practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.884
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it